
The Core Is LeakingHow Visa, Anthropic, and a $250,000 Box in Chicago Are Quietly Rewriting Who Controls American Banking
Ten days apart, on two separate earnings calls, the CEOs of two of the most powerful companies in American financial services said the opposite thing about the same deal.
On April 29, Visa CEO Ryan McInerney told Wall Street analysts that Wells Fargo had agreed to migrate to Pismo’s core account ledger as part of its core banking modernization over the coming years — and that Visa was already in conversations with other large banks. On May 8, FIS CEO Stephanie Ferris told her own analysts the move would have “absolutely no impact” on her business, dismissing Pismo as a mere “ledgering capability” rather than a real core banking platform.
Only one of them can be right.
Newsletter #5 documented FIS Chief Financial Officer James Kehoe’s March 18, 2026 declaration at the Wells Fargo Payments and Fintech Symposium that FIS would no longer pursue community banks under $10 billion in assets as a strategic priority. The story was clean: FIS abandoned the bottom of the market to chase the top.
What’s emerged in the eight weeks since is the second half of the picture — and it’s worse for FIS than the first half. Because while FIS was walking away from sub-$10B banks at the bottom, Visa was already walking up the ladder at the top. Citi has been on Pismo for corporate demand deposits since June 2023. JPMorgan Chase has been on Thought Machine’s Vault for Chase UK. Wells Fargo just became the third of the four largest U.S. banks to publicly commit a major workload to a non-incumbent cloud-native core. Bank of America is the only one of the Big Four with no public migration on record — and that may be its own story.
Meanwhile, in a Chicago workshop, a $250,000 hardware appliance called the Go1 — built by Series A startup Go Abacus — targets banks and credit unions that want AI without sending customer data to public cloud providers. Its CEO, David Moscatelli, demoed the Go1 on the FinovateSpring 2026 stage on May 6 and said the device had drawn 1,600 pre-orders. Two days later, Ferris told investors that FIS’s own AI strategy depends on a partnership with Anthropic structured as a usage-based model-access arrangement.
Two philosophies. Two ends of the market. One question: where does the American community bank land?
This is what Newsletter #5 was warning about. Here’s the receipts.
Top 10 U.S. Banks: Core Banking Stack — Where The Cloud-Native Migrations Are
| # | Bank | Assets (2025) | Core Banking Stack | Public Source / Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JPMorgan Chase | ~$4.14T | In-house legacy (U.S.) + Thought Machine Vault (Chase UK) | Thought Machine SuperCore at Chase UK; JPMorgan Chase adopting Vault for core banking transformation |
| 2 | Bank of America | ~$2.59T | In-house legacy + Infosys Finacle (job postings cite Finacle as a “plus” for engineering hires); no public cloud-native core migration | BofA careers page — Senior Engineer Payments Modernization JD |
| 3 | Citigroup | ~$1.76T | Pismo (corporate DDA via TTS) + legacy Citi systems | Citi TTS and Pismo jointly announced June 2023 that Citi will use Pismo’s technology platform to strengthen corporate demand deposit accounts |
| 4 | Wells Fargo | ~$1.71T | Migrating to Pismo’s core account ledger (announced 4/29/26) + legacy systems | McInerney announced Wells Fargo agreed to migrate to Pismo’s core account ledger as part of its core banking modernization |
| 5 | U.S. Bank (USBC) | ~$659B | Public record unclear — historically legacy with FIS/Fiserv tie-ins; no public cloud-native core migration announced | Reportable: open question |
| 6 | Goldman Sachs Bank | ~$598B | Infosys Finacle (for Marcus consumer platform, since wound down) + in-house institutional systems | Goldman publicly acknowledged using Infosys Finacle software to run Marcus, launched 2016 |
| 7 | PNC Bank | ~$549B | Public record unclear — legacy core; no public migration to Pismo, Thought Machine, or Mambu | Reportable: open question |
| 8 | Truist | ~$527B | Mixed legacy from 2019 BB&T (Fiserv) + SunTrust (FIS) merger; complex consolidation still in progress | Reportable: which provider won the consolidation? |
| 9 | Capital One | ~$490B | In-house cloud-native on AWS (no third-party core); closed all data centers in 2020 and rebuilt 80% of applications as cloud-native on AWS | AWS / Capital One case studies |
| 10 | State Street | ~$368B | Custody bank — different category (custody/asset servicing systems, not retail core) | N/A retail-core comparison |
Read of the Table
Of the top four — representing roughly half of U.S. banking assets — three have publicly committed major workloads to non-incumbent cloud-native core platforms: JPMorgan Chase (via Chase UK and Thought Machine), Citi (Pismo for TTS), and Wells Fargo (Pismo core ledger modernization). BofA remains the conspicuous holdout. Capital One pre-empted the debate years ago by rebuilding most of its infrastructure cloud-native on AWS.
Of the next six, three are publicly unclear (U.S. Bank, PNC, Truist consolidation) — reportable open questions for direct IR outreach. FIS does not appear as the primary cloud-native core modernization provider for any top-5 U.S. bank. That’s the structural finding underneath Ferris’s “absolutely no impact” framing.
Citi-Pismo 2023 — The Primary Source That Sets The Pattern
The Citi press release is hosted on citigroup.com under press-release/2023/citi-tts-selects-pismo-to-enrich-global-demand-deposit-account-solutions- — primary source, dated June 15–16, 2023, datelined “New York, NY and Bristol, UK.”
Citi Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) and Pismo jointly announced a relationship in which Citi will use Pismo’s technology platform to help strengthen Citi’s corporate demand deposit accounts (DDA), to clients worldwide. The release frames the deal as a core element to the TTS technology revamp strategy, allowing for better scalability and increased processing volumes, with the explicit goal of creating “always on” capabilities to enable clients to operate DDA capabilities in real-time with 24×7 processing.
Named source on the record: Stephen Randall, Global Head of Liquidity Management Services, Citi Treasury and Trade Solutions. Randall’s stated rationale was Pismo’s expertise in cloud-based banking and payments capabilities. He’s a callable source for follow-up — public record at Citi, public attribution on the press release.
Critical detail buried at the bottom: Pismo’s cloud-based core solutions are initially planned to be deployed by Citi in the U.S. market. So Citi’s first Pismo deployment was specifically U.S.-targeted, not international — directly relevant to the “Pismo is coming for U.S. core” thesis.
The deal predates the Visa acquisition by months. So Citi’s pre-Visa Pismo relationship is structurally important: when Visa bought Pismo in 2024, Visa inherited Citi as a customer. That means McInerney’s statement on the April 29 call about “more to share over time” with large bank pipeline includes an existing two-and-a-half-year working relationship at Citi — they have technical references, performance data, and an internal champion (Randall or his successor) already in place.
Why This Lands On Community Banks
The four largest banks in the country are not the customers FIS is fighting for. They are the customers FIS has already lost — or never had — on the cloud-native core question. Visa, through Pismo, is signing the top of the market. Anthropic, through FIS, is renting AI to the middle. Go Abacus, through the Go1 appliance, is selling on-premise AI to the bottom — the same bottom FIS told Wall Street it would no longer prioritize.
The structural compression Newsletter #5 documented — FIS walking away from sub-$10B banks — is now matched on the other end by Visa walking onto Wells Fargo’s core ledger. The middle of the market is the leftover. And the “absolutely no impact” line from Ferris on May 8 is what gets printed in earnings transcripts when a vendor watches its top-of-market growth path close and has to tell shareholders nothing has changed.
Visa announced a Wells Fargo migration that closes the top of the U.S. core market. FIS pressed mute.
What To Ask Your Board This Week
- If FIS genuinely has no exposure to the Wells Fargo–Pismo migration, why did the CEO need to call it “absolutely no impact” when an analyst raised it on her own earnings call?
- Which of our existing core, payments, and AI vendors have signed deals with the top 4 banks — and which of those banks did not pick our vendor?
- For our AI roadmap, are we paying our core provider a per-token markup to access a model we could license directly from Anthropic, OpenAI, or run on-premise via a Go1-class appliance?
- If Pismo (Visa) signs U.S. Bank, PNC, or Truist next, what is our deconversion clock with our incumbent core — and who is reading our contract to find out?
- Bank of America has no public cloud-native core migration on record. Is that the customer profile our vendor is now selling us as the “modernization standard,” or is BofA the cautionary tale our vendor doesn’t want us to ask about?
The Real Thing
Two CEOs. Two earnings calls. Ten days apart. One of them is selling a future the other is publicly denying exists. The future is already signed at Citi, signed at Wells Fargo, signed at JPMorgan Chase (in London, for now). The denial lives in an FIS earnings transcript.
The facts in this piece are drawn from public earnings call transcripts, vendor press releases, FedFis and Kansas City Fed market structure data, and primary-source bank IR communications. The connections between them are mine.
Primary Sources
citigroup.com (June 2023 Citi–Pismo press release) · Visa Q2 2026 earnings call (April 29, 2026) · FIS Q1 2026 earnings call (May 8, 2026) · Wells Fargo Payments and Fintech Symposium transcript (March 18, 2026) · FinovateSpring 2026 demo stage · AWS / Capital One case studies · BofA careers page · Goldman Sachs Marcus disclosures · Thought Machine investor materials · Kansas City Fed market structure of core banking services providers

